<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broken fotos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.walkingthinice.com/2012/07/8235/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.walkingthinice.com/2012/07/8235/</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Smith &#38; Lady</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.walkingthinice.com/2012/07/8235/comment-page-1/#comment-254131</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walkingthinice.com/?p=8235#comment-254131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow.. you make art happen even when things don&#039;t cooperate... bravo. 

Interesting shots.

I had to get another camera as well after damaging the last one. I dropped it and damaged the lens ever so slightly. But it was enough for it to not wish to take photos properly anymore.  And like you the new one does not do what the other did. 

So far the digital I&#039;ve liked best was a plain Kodak with no zoom. It took the best photos.. clear and crisp. But the battery (which was chargeable) no longer would take a charge. And a new battery seemed to not work... 

I&#039;m tempted to go back to an old box camera.. something basic and simple and see what I get?

All the new fangled gadgetry seems very temperamental.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.. you make art happen even when things don&#8217;t cooperate&#8230; bravo. </p>
<p>Interesting shots.</p>
<p>I had to get another camera as well after damaging the last one. I dropped it and damaged the lens ever so slightly. But it was enough for it to not wish to take photos properly anymore.  And like you the new one does not do what the other did. </p>
<p>So far the digital I&#8217;ve liked best was a plain Kodak with no zoom. It took the best photos.. clear and crisp. But the battery (which was chargeable) no longer would take a charge. And a new battery seemed to not work&#8230; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to go back to an old box camera.. something basic and simple and see what I get?</p>
<p>All the new fangled gadgetry seems very temperamental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
